On 25 December 2016 at 03:30, René Dudfield <ren...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been non contactable for a few weeks due to personal issues. Which I
> guess was frustrating to Thomas, which has led to this latest effort to
> make a new website.
>

I'm glad to see you back; I was a bit worried that something had happened
to you. I hope things are OK.

Truth be told, the website has been frustrating me for quite a long time,
but your absence really highlighted the need for something that doesn't
depend on a single person maintaining it, and I have seen on the mailing
list that there's a lot of talent and enthusiasm that could be harnessed if
the website was a more collaborative project.

>
>    - most parts of the website can be updated (by wiki, bitbucket,
>    stackoverflow, etc)
>
> This is a good point, and I should update the 'Getting Started' page on
the wiki. I cannot, however, see a way to update the all-important Download
page.

>
>    - we need to document who has access to which admin things (there are
>    a few people who have access to everything, but I guess not everyone knows
>    each other, and some people go inactive some times)
>
> +1. For instance, you mentioned that users jmm0 and TheSheep also have
admin access to Disqus, but those usernames don't obviously relate to
anyone I remember on the mailing list or on Bitbucket, so I'm not sure who
they are or how to contact them.

>
>    - moderation, respect and spam are issues we need to work on.
>
> +1. I hope you don't feel that our efforts to build a replacement site in
your absence were disrespectful :-)

> Looking forward to moving forward on the new website!
>
How would you like to see the transition happen? Now that you're back we
can presumably make some updates to the current site, which reduces the
pressure to replace it. I'd still like to see things like the download page
generated from files in version control, so that people can update them
through pull requests. My inclination is to move the wiki content into
version control as well.

For the game feed and the login system, how important do you think it is to
maintain the data from the old site? We could try to build a Python web
application around the same database, and then switch over to it. That
would be significantly more work than making a new system from scratch, but
it means a smoother transition, and preserves the existing archive. Do you
want to keep using the current server for dynamic parts of a new site, or
move pygame away from it?

Thanks,
Thomas

Reply via email to