Christian Reis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 06:16:56PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:Is there any reason why you wouldn't want to distribute it separately, or even with scintilla itself?
Johan, James: want to look at including this for the next release ofScintilla 1.48 has been GTK2 enabled for a while now, and 1.49 nowA while ago a made a patch (attached) for this, but I don't really recall if it was working correctly. If there is any interest I could have a
supports Unicode. Only the port of the wrapper GtkScintilla to GTK2 is
needed and we are in business. Anybody already working on that ?
second look into it. Or anybody else could pick up the ball.. :-)
1.99?
I don't want to put it in pygtk, as I would like to keep it fairly low in the dependency graph (if pygtk depends on everything, then it makes building things that depend on pygtk a pain). It also doesn't seem to fit in as a gnome core library either.
James.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux.conf.au http://linux.conf.au/
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ | Jan 22-25 Perth, Western Australia.
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/