On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:40, Simon van der Linden > <svdlin...@src.gnome.org> wrote: >> On 13 Oct 2009, at 18:40, Colin Walters wrote: >>> Does anyone know the status of merging the Summer of Code branch for >>> improving the GObject Introspection support? >> >> Nothing has been merged yet. A bug has been opened: >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597697 >> >>> Is it blocked on patch review? >> >> Basically, yes; it needs a reviewer. > > Would like to see some movement here, Simon has done a great work and > I personally think that introspection support is very important for > the future of PyGTK. > > From my POV, the person most knowledgeable about introspection support > in PyGObject is Johan Dahlin, but he's probably too busy at Litl to > carry the review forward. I'm cc'ing him so he can express his opinion > if he wishes. > > The second in line would be me, who took Johan's work and pushed it > forward enough to run Sugar on top of it, see: > > http://blog.tomeuvizoso.net/2009/05/reducing-sugars-memory-usage.html > > Simon carried his GSoC project on top of my work adding lots of > missing stuff and cleaning up the code a lot. > > Also, I have a big interest in doing a good review because I'm going > to be working myself on this area in the near future, and hopefully > the next release of Sugar will depend heavily on it. > > So I propose that I review the part of the branch that affects > girepository and find someone else who reviews the small bits that > affect the rest of pygobject.
I can help out reviewing the parts of pygobject. Is it a big patch? Where can I find it? -- Johan Dahlin _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
