On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:41, Aaron DeVore <[email protected]> wrote: >> There currently isn't an official naming scheme for the PyPy >> executable for system installations. Of the 3 setups I've seen, the >> official build uses pypy, Arch Linux uses pypy, and Gentoo Linux uses >> pypy-c<version>. > > FWIW, if people feel it should be pypy instead of pypy-c, I'm happy to > change it.
We (arbitrarily) decided pypy for binary distributions. It's still called pypy-c when it is compiled. I would go for pypy. Note that there is no point in pypy2.7-1.9, since there will never be any other pypy2 but pypy2.7. pypy3.3-1.9 sounds relatively obscure and verbose to me, but whatever. How about pypypy for pypy3 instead? (<joke>) Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
