On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Mark Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-10-03, Phil Thompson wrote: >> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:11:19 +0200, Detlev Offenbach > Here's my personal "wish list" for Python 3/PyQt4 (including those that > Phil is going to do as he says above): > > - No QString, only str, plus some static functions for things that str > doesn't provide, e.g., QString.simplified(s : str) -> str > - No QByteArray, only bytes (or bytearray) > - No QVariant, only object > - Guarantee that "from PyQt4.QtGui import *" and similar will only > import objects whose name begins with capital Q.
That'd be cool. An alternative that I think would be even better would be to provide a "Qt" namespace as per QtRuby and drop the Q prefix from the classes, so Qt.Application, Qt.Widget, &c. That'd dodge the ugly namespace pollution while not causing much more typing. _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt