On 3/7/2009 6:50 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:06:12 +0100, Detlev Offenbach
<det...@die-offenbachs.de> wrote:
Hi,
please include the PyQt4 documentation as a compressed Qt Help files
(*.qch)
as well. eric4 will support Qt Help collections starting with the first
4.4
snapshot.
An opportune moment to ask for opinions...
When I (eventually) get round to improving the PyQt docs (particularly
making the API reference more Pythonic) it will be designed to support (in
theory) multiple output styles. In the Roadmap I specifically mention the
traditional Qt style and Sphinx (ie. that used for the Python v2.6
documentation).
Which of these two styles do people prefer?
As long as I can open it in the Qt Assistant, it does not matter. Qt
Assistant is several order of magnitudes faster than using Firefox, for
browsing documentation. It's unvaluable, for instance, to start typing
"setLab" and see all the matches in realtime and quickly find the
correct method within whatever class it happens to be inside.
--
Giovanni Bajo
Develer S.r.l.
http://www.develer.com
_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
