Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 08:51 AM 12/14/2007 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote: >> UserDict is a relict from the >> past and scheduled for removal. > > Really? Why?
Because a Google Spreed Sheet says so. *jk* > Er, no, its functionality *isn't* replaced by subclassable dict, > since subclassable dict does stuff you can't override (e.g. copy() > doesn't return a subclass instance). Brett has started the stdlib reorg. In the past couple of days we have created a list of modules to be renamed or removed. We have *not* made any decision yet. The User* modules are just marked as to be extinguished during the stdlib reorg. I see your point. A few minutes ago I added another sheet that lists modules to be replaced or rewritten. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
