On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Marty Alchin wrote:
> First, thanks for taking the time to answer thoroughly. I realize I > could've come across as antagonistic, so I'm glad you realized I just > wanted some more information. I'm just wary about whether a magazine > can really sustain itself these days, but I'm definitely willing to > help find out. > > I'm at least pleased to hear that you don't have expectations for > being successful in a traditional, commercial sense because I think an > attitude like that will help ensure it doesn't fall apart over silly > things. However, that also makes it more of a labor of love, which has > its own pitfalls, as any open source developer will freely admit. Well, maybe that deserves a tad bit of clarification: I *do* expect it to be commercially successful, because I *don't* plan for it to follow most of what we think of as 'traditional' in the context of magazines in general. > So consider me on board so far, and I'll be interested to see how this > shapes up and where I can be of help. Thanks, Marty - I should have the domain set up with a proper mailing list at some point in the next few weeks (hopefully in the next *1* week, but I can't commit to that). I'll shoot emails to everyone so they can explicitly opt-in at that time. brian > > -Marty
_______________________________________________ Python-authors mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-authors
