Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
It seems like any 3.2.6 testing that is going to be done, has been done.
I've been kinda swamped with unrelated things past two weeks, so I
wasn't paying much attention. Perhaps an e-mail summarizing the +1's so
far and a quick vote of the core group on whether this is enough?
Grisha
Here is the summary of the 3.2.6 testing to date. Let me know if I've
missed anyone's tests or you still want to toss you test on the pile.
For the 3.2.6b tarball (same as 3.2.6 but with the messed up version
string).
+1 Gentoo [current], Apache-2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python-2.4, gcc-3.4.4
+1 Linux (amd64) Ubuntu Breezy 5.10, apache 2.0.54 mpm-worker python 2.4
+1 Linux Debian sid, apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), python 2.3
+1 Linux Debian sarge, apache 2.0.54 (mpm-worker), python 2.3
+1 Mac OS X 10.3, Apache 2.0.55, python 2.3
+1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
+1 Windows XP, python 2.4
+1 Windows 2000, python 2.3
For 3.2.6
+1 Fedora Core 4 Apache 2.0.54 Python 2.4.1
+1 Linux Debian sid, apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), python 2.3
+1 Linux Debian sarge, apache 2.0.54 (mpm-worker), python 2.3
+1 MacOS-10.4.4 Apache-2.0.55 mpm-prefork Python-2.4.2
+1 Windows 2000 Server SP4, Python 2.3
+1 Windows XP Pro SP2, Python 2.4
+1 Windows XP Pro SP2 Apache 2.0.54 Python 2.4.2
0 HP Tru64, mpm-worker
On the bsd front, Barry Pederson reported a problem with FreeBSD 6.0 but
didn't issue an actual -1. FreeBSD and I are still not getting along,
but with a small manual tweak of the Makefile I was able to run all the
tests successfully. I don't know if there is a configure problem or if
it's just my BSD incompetence but I'm willing to issue a shaky +0 for
FreeBSD 6.0.
Jim
