On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:01:20 -0500, James Y Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Basically, I'd like to see them be given a binding somewhere, and have
> their claimed module agree with that, but am not particular as to
> where. Option #2 seemed to be rejected last time, and option #1 was
> given approval, so that's what I wrote a patch for. It sounds like it's
> getting pretty strong "no" votes this time around, however. Therefore,
> I would like to suggest option #3, with <newmodule> being, say,
> 'internals'.

+1

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to