> >(So do you want this feature now or not? Earlier you said it was no big > deal.) > > It *isn't* a big deal; but it'd still be nice, and I'd happily volunteer > to > do the actual implementation of the 'close()' method myself, because it's > about the same amount of work as updating PEP 333 and sorting out any > political issues that might arise therefrom. :)
Can I recommend tabling this one for the time being. My sense is that it can be accepted independently of PEP 340 but that it should wait until afterwards because the obvious right-thing-to-do will be influenced by what happens with 340. Everyone's bandwidth is being maxed-out at this stage. So it is somewhat helpful to keep focused on the core proposal of generator driven block/suite thingies. Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
