BJörn Lindqvist wrote: > But why stop there? Lots of functions that takes a callable as > argument could be upgraded to use the new block syntax.
Actually, this is something that occurred to me in potential support of a thunk implementation: It's possible that many functions already out there which take function arguments could *already* be used with a thunk-based block statement, without needing to be re-written at all. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
