On 5/6/05, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, busy-work or not, I took the 20 minutes to split them up, so I > figured I might as well make them available. It was actually really > easy to split them apart, and I think they both read better this way, > but I'm not sure my opinion counts for much here anyway. ;-) (The > Enhanced Iterators PEP is first, the remainder of PEP 340 follows it.)
Thanks for doing this. I think you may well be right - the two pieces feel more orthogonal like this (I haven't checked for dependencies, I'm trusting your editing and Guido's original assertion that the parts are independent). > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > PEP: XXX > Title: Enhanced Iterators Strawman question - as this is the "uncontroversial" bit, can this part be accepted as it stands? :-) Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
