Wolfgang Lipp wrote: > > Just because you don't read the documentation and guessed wrong > > d.get() needs to be removed?!? > > no, not removed... never said that.
Fair enough, you proposed to remove the behavior. Not sure how that's all that much less bad, though... > implied). the reason of being for d.get() -- to me -- is simply so you > get a chance to pass a default value, which is syntactically well-nigh > impossible with d['x']. Close, but the main reason to add d.get() was to avoid the exception. The need to specify a default value followed from that. Just _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
