Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > The object isn't really destroyed. Simply ob_refcnt drops to zero, > then tp_dealloc is called, which is supposed to destroy it. But since I > wrote tp_dealloc, I choose not to destroy it,
Be aware that a C subclass of your wrapper that overrides tp_dealloc is going to have its tp_dealloc called before yours, and will therefore be partly destroyed before you get control. Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
