On 2020-01-31 19:58, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 01/31/2020 10:47 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
On 2020-01-23 07:20, Victor Stinner wrote:
Python 3.9 introduces many small incompatible changes which broke tons
There's a well-known and established way of signaling breaking changes in
software platforms—it is to increment the major version number.
Rather than debating the merits of breaking code on 3.9 or 3.10, wouldn't it
make more sense to do it in a Python 4.0 instead?
I've gotta say, I like that plan. Instead of going to x.10, go to x+1.0.
Every ten years we bump the major version and get rid of all the deprecations.
It has a certain appeal for me too.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/Q24LBBZ4P2PAUBU5B2K7HNXP3HJXFBEP/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
