On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 at 01:37, Brandt Bucher <brandtbuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark Shannon said: > > I was relying on the "reference" implementation, which is also in the PEP. > > Can you please stop putting scare quotes around "reference implementation"?
Agreed - apart from the implication Brandt noted, it's also misleading. The code is in Python 3.10, so the correct term is "the implementation" (or if you want to be picky, "the CPython implementation"). To me, the term "reference implementation" implies "for reference, not yet released". At this point, we're discussing fixes to an implemented Python 3.10 feature, not tidying up a PEP. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3VFVVRSTVIV4A7MKW65NZRFZQ4CEKUX5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/