On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 at 01:37, Brandt Bucher <brandtbuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mark Shannon said:
> > I was relying on the "reference" implementation, which is also in the PEP.
>
> Can you please stop putting scare quotes around "reference implementation"?

Agreed - apart from the implication Brandt noted, it's also
misleading. The code is in Python 3.10, so the correct term is "the
implementation" (or if you want to be picky, "the CPython
implementation"). To me, the term "reference implementation" implies
"for reference, not yet released".

At this point, we're discussing fixes to an implemented Python 3.10
feature, not tidying up a PEP.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3VFVVRSTVIV4A7MKW65NZRFZQ4CEKUX5/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to