On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 01:21, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > Regardless, there are no plans to halt what was decided when we accepted PEP > 581. Most of the concerns which have been brought up in this thread were > already expressed back then (the account merge one I didn't remember, hence > why I replied).
I don't have a strong opinion regarding the use of github accounts, but just to note, this thread was about the open issue in PEP 588, not about PEP 581 - https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0588/#a-github-account-should-not-be-a-requirement. PEP 588 has not been accepted, so it's not necessarily relevant to the actual migration plan here, but I do think it's reasonable to ask for some clarification. Either PEP 588 should be rejectected, noting that the actual implementation plan is being maintained differently, or it should be updated as an ongoing document as the planning process goes ahead. I suspect the update on this particular open question might well be "the problem was considered, and ultimately it was concluded that requiring a github account was not a showstopper". That may not please some people (I don't personally care) but that's fine - not everything has to be unanimous, as long as the SC approves. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UYIGMYAXU25AGLOPEQY2AMWQZ4CCCFZD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
