Steve Dower wrote:
> Okay, I'll let myself get sucked into responding ONE TIME, but only 
> because you gave me such a nice API to work with :)

This actually pushed me hard towards adding the null-aware operators.  I agree 
that the named-function approach Paul suggests is better.  I admit that there 
are times when a comprehensive model is good, and that if the DB schema is 
automatically generated, it should look something like this.

But this is long enough that I would be unhappy if it were what I had to read 
to understand the database in the first place.  (Yes, I know Java beans are 
pretty widely tolerated, but ... that doesn't make longer code desirable.)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/OFZZ4PYT4EWTXHZ2PGRO3FBFRPCV4NZC/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to