On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 22:40:25 -0800 "Gregory P. Smith" <g...@krypto.org> wrote: > > rerunning a mere few of those in --rigorous mode for more runs does not > significantly improve the stddev so I'm not going to let that finish.
The one benchmark that is bigint-heavy is pidigits AFAIK, so you might want to re-run that one if you want a more rigorous confirmation that there is no regression. > my recommendation: proceed with removing 15-bit bignum digit support. > 30-bit only future with simpler better code here we come. Sounds reasonable to me as well. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/MRE5HF3XRKJBEHF3YJNGXWXECLX7GQGG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
