Gareth McCaughan wrote: > but wouldn't if be nice if you could say > > def f((x0,y0) as p0, (x1,y1) as p1):
I'm not sure that it would. Currently you can look at a function header and get a picture of its calling signature, but this would clutter it up with implementation details of the function that aren't relevant to the caller. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
