On 4/28/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference > >implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more > >something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to > >take care of. > > I'm fine with a super-simple implementation that emphasizes the concept, > not feature-richness. A simple dict-based implementation showcases both > the wsgiref function for path shifting, and the idea of composing an > application out of mini-applications. (The point is to demonstrate how > people can compose WSGI applications *without* needing a framework.) > > But I don't think that this demo should be a prefix mapper; people doing > more sophisticated routing can use Paste or Routes. > > If it's small enough, I'd say to add this mapper to wsgiref.util, or if > Guido is strongly set against it being in the code, we should at least put > it in the documentation as an example of how to use 'shift_path_info()' in > wsgiref.util.
Perhaps this could go in Demo/wsgiref/? Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
