Actually after all the -1 responses I wasn't going to reconsider this for 2.x; maybe for py3k. Most of the -1 votes were unconditional; only a few respondents thought that I was proposing it for 2.5.
--Guido On 4/29/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 4/29/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So the relatively non-controversial bit (improving the error reporting) > was > > added immediately, and the controversial bit postponed to see if the > better > > error reporting had any effect on the demand for it. > > > This is exactly how I intended it, and I believe that's Guido's desire, too. > Otherwise, he would've asked me to make the warning a FutureWarning, > instead. (Which could of course still happen.) > > -- > Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me > spread! > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
