At 09:27 AM 6/19/2006 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >Guido van Rossum wrote: >>Um, is this dogma? Wouldn't a switch statement also be a welcome >>addition to the readability? I haven't had the time to follow this >>thread (still catching up on my Google 50%) but I'm not sure I agree >>with the idea that a switch should only exist for speedup. >> > >A switch-statement offers only a modest readability improvement over >if-elif chains. If a proposal introduces a switch-statement but doesn't >support fast dispatch, then it loses much of its appeal.
I would phrase that a lot differently. A switch statement is *very* attractive for its readability. The main problem is that if the most expressive way to do something in Python is also very slow -- i.e., people use it when they should be using a dictionary of functions -- then it adds to the "Python is slow" meme by attractive nuisance. :) Therefore, a switch statement should be made to perform at least as well as a dictionary of functions, or having it might actually be a bad thing. In any case, we *can* make it perform as well as a dictionary of functions, and we can do it with or without another opcode. What really needs to be decided on (i.e. by the BDFL) is the final syntax of the statement itself, and the semantics of evaluation time for the 'case' expressions, either at first execution of the switch statement, or at function definition time. If explaining the evaluation time is too difficult, however, it might be an argument against the optimization. But, I don't think that either first-use evaluation or definition-time evaluation are too hard to explain, since Python has both kinds of evaluation already. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
