In data 14 giugno 2008 alle ore 22:09:56, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> No, not at all. I actually *like* having to specify the object on a > method call. I find C++/Java code very hard to read which invokes a > method without specifying this. infront of the call - in particular > when you are unfamiliar with the class hierarchy you are looking at. > (due to late binding, it is still difficult to find out what specific > method is being called, but atleast you can be certain it's a method, > and you might even have a clue what the dynamic type of the object > is). > > So I think the FAQ should continue to claim that Python cannot grow > a Pascal-like with statement. > > Regards, > Martin OK. It was just an idea... Thanks Cesare Di Mauro _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
