2008/12/4 A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * that there will be a Python 2.7 that will incorporate what we learn from > people trying to port, > * that 3.1 will rearrange the standard library in mostly-known ways, and > * that we expect people to use 3.0 mostly for compatibility testing, > not going into serious production use until 3.1 or maybe even 3.2.
I think that would be fantastic to have a small set of straightforward sentences like these, to transmit the most important stuff. For my part, when it's fixed, I will translate them to spanish and propagate them. > (The details are open to discussion, of course.) I think those are fine. I would add something about the migration path, something like "If you want to start testing your library/system in 3.0, you should first use Python 2.6, see migration details [here]" Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
