On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On that basis I'm +1 on Alexandre's proposal. A 3rd party planning on > working on a 2.8 release (not that I think such a party currently > exists) can step up and extract the relevant tickets for their later > reference if they feel the need. Let's not stop moving forward for the > convenience of a hypothetical 2.8 development team. Yes, closing the tickets as "won't fix" and tagging them as "will-never-happen-in-2.x" or something, is the best combination of both worlds: it will clean the tracker and ease further developments, and will allow anybody to pick up those tickets later. (I'm +1 too to Alexandre's proposal, btw) -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
