On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:05:59 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on Nick's suggestion of try_monotonic. It is clear and obvious and doesn't > mislead.
How about "monotonicest". (No, this is not really a serious suggestion.) However, time.steadiest might actually work. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
