On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 at 07:41 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Nov 05, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.pyc: default mode > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.fat-0.pyc: FAT mode > > > >With -O: > > > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.opt-1.pyc: default mode > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.fat-1.pyc: FAT mode > > > > > >With -OO: > > > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.opt-2.pyc: default mode > >- Lib/__pycache__/os.cpython-36.fat-2.pyc: FAT mode > > > >Is it the "correct" way to name .pyc files? I had to modify unit tests > >which expected an exact filename. > > I think this is the logical extension of PEP 488 for your use case. >
It will require tweaking importlib.util.cache_from_source() to no longer restriction to alphanumeric-only for the optimization level, but that can be tweaked to use `opt-` when given an alphanumeric and then to blindly use another value otherwise.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
