Ahh .. yes of course, you are right. I mis-typed. I like how you
defined the dictionary all in one statement, though. I didn't think
of doing it that way.
-- Arcadio
On Jun 19, 4:11 pm, heltena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> asincero ha escrit:
>
>
>
> > def foo():
> > def doCase1():
> > pass
> > def doCase2():
> > pass
> > def doCase3():
> > pass
> > def doCase4():
> > pass
> > def doCase5():
> > pass
>
> > handle_case = {}
> > handle_case[1] = doCase1()
> > handle_case[2] = doCase2()
> > handle_case[3] = doCase3()
> > handle_case[4] = doCase4()
> > handle_case[5] = doCase5()
>
> Sorry, but I think this is not correct. Now, you put the result of the
> function call into the dictionary, but you want the function address.
>
> The correct code is:
> handle_case = {}
> handle_case[1] = doCase1
> handle_case[2] = doCase2
> handle_case[3] = doCase3
> handle_case[4] = doCase4
> handle_case[5] = doCase5
>
> Or:
> handle_case = { 1: doCase1, 2: doCase2, 3: doCase3, 4: doCase4, 5:
> doCase 5 }
>
> Or:
> try:
> { 1: doCase1, 2: doCase2, 3: doCase3, 4: doCase4, 5: doCase 5 }
> [c]()
> except:
> print "Catch the correct exception"
>
> But this solutions only works fine if the params of the functions are
> the same for all calls (in if/else construct you don't need it).
>
> Bye!
>
> --
> Helio Tejedor
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
