Hanna Czenczek <hre...@redhat.com> noted that the array index in virtio_blk_dma_restart_cb() is not bounds-checked:
g_autofree VirtIOBlockReq **vq_rq = g_new0(VirtIOBlockReq *, num_queues); ... while (rq) { VirtIOBlockReq *next = rq->next; uint16_t idx = virtio_get_queue_index(rq->vq); rq->next = vq_rq[idx]; ^^^^^^^^^^ The code is correct because both rq->vq and vq_rq[] depend on num_queues, but this is indirect and not 100% obvious. Add an assertion. Suggested-by: Hanna Czenczek <hre...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> --- hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c index a0735a9bca..f3193f4b75 100644 --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c @@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_cb(void *opaque, bool running, VirtIOBlockReq *next = rq->next; uint16_t idx = virtio_get_queue_index(rq->vq); + assert(idx < num_queues); rq->next = vq_rq[idx]; vq_rq[idx] = rq; rq = next; -- 2.43.0