On 3/14/2024 9:03 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:39 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei....@oracle.com> wrote:
On setups with one or more virtio-net devices with vhost on,
dirty tracking iteration increases cost the bigger the number
amount of queues are set up e.g. on idle guests migration the
following is observed with virtio-net with vhost=on:
48 queues -> 78.11% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
8 queues -> 40.50% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
1 queue -> 6.89% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
2 devices, 1 queue -> 18.60% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
With high memory rates the symptom is lack of convergence as soon
as it has a vhost device with a sufficiently high number of queues,
the sufficient number of vhost devices.
On every migration iteration (every 100msecs) it will redundantly
query the *shared log* the number of queues configured with vhost
that exist in the guest. For the virtqueue data, this is necessary,
but not for the memory sections which are the same. So essentially
we end up scanning the dirty log too often.
To fix that, select a vhost device responsible for scanning the
log with regards to memory sections dirty tracking. It is selected
when we enable the logger (during migration) and cleared when we
disable the logger. If the vhost logger device goes away for some
reason, the logger will be re-selected from the rest of vhost
devices.
After making mem-section logger a singleton instance, constant cost
of 7%-9% (like the 1 queue report) will be seen, no matter how many
queues or how many vhost devices are configured:
48 queues -> 8.71% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
2 devices, 8 queues -> 7.97% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
Co-developed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei....@oracle.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
- add comment to clarify effect on cache locality and
performance
v2 -> v3:
- add after-fix benchmark to commit log
- rename vhost_log_dev_enabled to vhost_dev_should_log
- remove unneeded comparisons for backend_type
- use QLIST array instead of single flat list to store vhost
logger devices
- simplify logger election logic
---
hw/virtio/vhost.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
index 612f4db..58522f1 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
static struct vhost_log *vhost_log[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
static struct vhost_log *vhost_log_shm[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
+static QLIST_HEAD(, vhost_dev) vhost_log_devs[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
/* Memslots used by backends that support private memslots (without an fd). */
static unsigned int used_memslots;
@@ -149,6 +150,47 @@ bool vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
}
}
+static inline bool vhost_dev_should_log(struct vhost_dev *dev)
+{
+ assert(dev->vhost_ops);
+ assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type > VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_NONE);
+ assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type < VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX);
+
+ return dev == QLIST_FIRST(&vhost_log_devs[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]);
A dumb question, why not simple check
dev->log == vhost_log_shm[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]
Because we are not sure if the logger comes from vhost_log_shm[] or
vhost_log[]. Don't want to complicate the check here by calling into
vhost_dev_log_is_shared() everytime when the .log_sync() is called.
-Siwei
?
Thanks
