Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yuval Kashtan wrote:
As I can see,
There is HUGH interest in management API for QEMU.
seemly, DBus is NOT the right solution for direct integration into
QEMU as it is not cross platform enough, pose extra dependency and
(probably) not suitable for embedded systems.
Keeping only the "old" monitor interface with no formal interface
will make QEMU harder to integrate with as it requires extra work
Why can't we make the monitor interface a "formal" interface?
Because then fixing a type or extending the interface becomes a pain.
It's also much more difficult to specify a text-base interface
completey, compared to a C api (where sometimes all you need is the
header and a few comments).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
