On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:02:55 PM Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 10.07.2013 16:31, schrieb Paul Moore: > > On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 04:30:01 PM Paul Moore wrote: > >> In order to enable the asynchronous I/O functionality when using the > >> seccomp sandbox we need to add the associated syscalls to the > >> whitelist. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> > >> qemu-seccomp.c | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c > >> index 031da1d..ca123bf 100644 > >> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c > >> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c > >> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall > >> seccomp_whitelist[] = { { SCMP_SYS(stat), 245 }, > >> > >> { SCMP_SYS(uname), 245 }, > >> { SCMP_SYS(eventfd2), 245 }, > >> > >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_getevents), 245 }, > >> > >> { SCMP_SYS(dup), 245 }, > >> { SCMP_SYS(dup2), 245 }, > >> { SCMP_SYS(dup3), 245 }, > >> > >> @@ -229,7 +230,9 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall > >> seccomp_whitelist[] = { { SCMP_SYS(sendmmsg), 241 }, > >> > >> { SCMP_SYS(recvmmsg), 241 }, > >> { SCMP_SYS(prlimit64), 241 }, > >> > >> - { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 } > >> + { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 }, > >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_setup), 241 }, > >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_destroy), 241 } > >> > >> }; > >> > >> int seccomp_start(void) > > > > Any reason this patch wasn't pulled in for 1.5.1? > > Yes: You forget to put a line Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org into the commit > message nor was it ever CC'ed while on the list. ;)
You learn something new everyday, thanks. Can I assume this will make it into 1.5.2 now? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat