Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 15 July 2013 16:15, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> Hard freeze is two weeks away. >> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.6 > > I've just noticed that this is still inconsistent. That > page says: > > "Soft feature freeze. Major features should have initial code > committed by this date." > > but it links to http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/SoftFeatureFreeze > which says > "By the date of the soft feature freeze, any major feature > should have some code posted to the qemu-devel mailing list" > > I'm pretty sure the latter is right (you only need code > posted, not committed) -- can we fix whichever of the two > pages is wrong, please?
It depends on the definition of "major". Any *feature* should have patches posted by soft freeze. I guess a tiny feature would be an exception. For major features (things that have a high likelihood of breaking things), the feature should have started getting merged already. I'll update the wiki text to be clearer. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > thanks > -- PMM
