On Monday, September 09, 2013 03:48:09 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 09/09/2013 15:20, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: > >> Out of respect for the work that Eduardo has done, and is > >> continuing to do, with the QEMU seccomp filtering, I think Eduardo > >> should be the one to take on this role. If Eduardo declines I'll do > >> ahead and submit a patch adding myself to the MAINTAINERS file. > > > > If this is ok for everyone, I would be really glad to take this role to > > myself. Paul, thanks for this vote of confidence. Paolo, should I send a > > patch for MAINTAINERS right away? > > Ok, I was suggesting Paul because he was the one doing reviews. > > Eduardo, that is also okay for me. However, even as a maintainer please > do wait for Paul's reviews. Many areas of QEMU have maintainers that do > not send their own patches without a review, so this wouldn't be a new > rule. :)
Okay, with respect to maintainership, I was thinking more along the lines of the Linux Kernel where those that do the work get the job; it looks like QEMU has a slightly different twist on the idea. If it makes more sense to the QEMU devs you can always add me as a co-maintainer. Regardless, I do plan on continuing to review/test patches and I don't expect that to change in the near future. > Please wait for Anthony's ack. I changed the subject and CCed him to > grab his attention. > > Paolo -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat
