On 09/12/2013 01:29 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > I see the problem related to the previous patch. > What about continuing to use int in the previous patch, > and replace it with bool in this one? The previous patch would only target > the way ext is set, > and this one would really contain all bool changes.
For the next edition, I'm planning to swap the order of the first two patches, and also quit using bool. I think TCGType is a bit more descriptive here, and also uses the same 0/1 values that we want. I added a QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON to assert that the enum values don't change. r~
