Hello, Eric Blake, on Thu 24 Mar 2016 15:36:19 -0600, wrote: > What happens if 'net' is provided but 'ip4' is false? Is that a user error?
We could do that, yes. > The existing 'InetSocketAddress' QAPI type spells these as 'ipv4' and > ipv6'; should we use the same spelling for consistency? Then it's inconsistent with the ip6-* options, but we can change those, since they are still new. > Was the intent to allow 'ip6-prefix':'none' as the special case for > disabling IPv6? That was the original plan, but a boolean was suggested instead. Samuel
