Dr. David Alan Gilbert, on mar. 28 févr. 2017 17:40:19 +0000, wrote: > * Samuel Thibault (samuel.thiba...@gnu.org) wrote: > > Dr. David Alan Gilbert, on mar. 28 févr. 2017 17:09:26 +0000, wrote: > > > but only for Linux. > > > > That's what I was referring to. > > Yes I think that's OK because: > a) The alternative breaks all backwards migration > b) This doesn't casuse any problem for forward migration > > There is another way, we could add a subsection that's sent whenever > we use non-IPv4; that would (probably) fail noisily on a backwards > migration to an old setup. But IMHO it's not worth it in this case > given how rare a backwards migration of an IPv6 slirp connection on > something other than Linux is.
Alright. Samuel
