Hi Martin, On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Martin Dobias <wonder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Pirmin Kalberer <pi...@sourcepole.com> > wrote:> > > I understand that you want to go on. But I think that the decision for a > > plugin development infrastructure should happen in Wroclaw, with many > devs > > involved. We can show there the different approaches and help the > attending > > people setting up new software (like git), if needed. A discussion about > pros > > and cons of such a decision takes quite some time, especially when > discussed > > by mail. Time, which many devs do not have during their daily work. The > result > > of a hasty decision is usually: "let's stay with the old tools we already > > know". > > I completely agree that making decisions for the infrastructure > shouldn't be too hasty... Wroclaw hackfest looks like a good place to > try to resolve the current situation - also regarding the management > of installed plugins, plugin UI guidelines etc. coming back to the PostGIS plugins, I think Wroclaw would be also good place to merge some of them (e.g. improving PostGis Manager by adding the RT Sql Layer capabilities). To think big, we can refactor the pg_manager creating a new manager which manages both postgis and spatialite. In this manner we wouldn't have a lot of duplicated code for the spatialite_manager and we can easily extend it to manage others spatial dbs. I think the first step is using the QtSql module instead of the psycopg2 one within pg_manager. I don't know if there are some limitations in this moment, but I see it's on the pg_manager's TODO list. What's your opinion? Cheers. -- Giuseppe Sucameli
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer