The question actually is which one of these schemes do QL users want : I think the democratic version
Duncan Neithercut -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of - Aucun - Sent: 23 November 2004 09:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH > So, essentially, throwing muck at Quanta is part of the problem. > It's an information and opinion overload that prevents any > concensus. half the people are for something. Half the people are > against something. There's lots of overlap. Paralysis! In a business there is only one who takes decisions. Can be dangerous but also very successfull. In a democracy people are elected on a program, and then they more or less do what they said. Are the decisions at Quanta "top level" made according to one of these schemes? Arnould WebMail / Magic OnLine http://www.magic.fr _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
