ZN wrote: >>So didn't you get them? I had a brief look at them ages ago >>and had the understanding that they're on their way to you. > No, never got them... I only saw them when Keith oiginally got them and > they were really faxed through and quite unreadable at that point. I have > no idea what happened to them after that.
He did type them up, though I'm not sure whether it was already 100% complete back then. Perhaps somebody could ask Keith? I don't have his address. > That would be the most logical choice for a regulat 'home use' machine, but > not at all for something which can also be sold on the embedded market. > SMSQ/E could be interesting in such markets even if emulated, but not at > the price of involving PC hardware (although price is OK, reliability is > questionable as is the cumbersome nature of it). Right, I see. > Actually, Motorola/Freescale just announced data for their V5 core. They > did put back a few more things but most of the semi-compatibility remains. > Even so, if you had the time to look at that long email on this issue, it's > a whole lot more manageable if you restrict things to emulaing 68000 plus a > few choice extensions. See other mail. >> The ATX/BAT market is already served by the Qx0. > Actually only BAT and that is very much dead. I'm thinking of even > smaller. I thought the design was done to fit in both cases, but I could be wrong. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
