gwicks schreef: <SNIP> > Even better let people on this list give their 10 most popular programs.
Here is my list of most used programs: Qspread v. 4.03 QD v.b.01 QPAC1 v. 1.00 QPAC2 v. 1.42 Easyptr 4.09 Agenda v. 1.09 Basic Linker v. 2.07 QPC2 v. 3.30 Wined v. 1.26 Fifi v. 4.30 Suqcess v. 2.03 Qtyp2 v. 2.04 QDT v.1.00r DataDesign LineDesign QL2PC and STIJL check Multi sprite viewer and Menu viewer P. Witte ProwesS/Proforma QLDBAS v 1.11 This could be the start of a very long list. > > 5: Don't be naive enough to think that you will get replies to emails if you > send them out. Tony Firshman has been doing email shots advertising shows > for almost 6 years and I have been doing snail mails for 2 years. Some > traders, including software traders, have never given us a single reply to > our emails asking for their copy. (Quanta used to be one of the worse > offenders until you came along, John. For your efficiency we are very > grateful.), I didn't know we (users) were supposed to comment react or reply to those. Lack or absence of comments? Here is one on Roy Wood's 'Very FEXing' (QLTODAY Vol 10 Issue 3). He is so right in his article. It would have been so easy to to avoid the problems with 'FEX'; a quick look at the 'keywords list' (Dilwyn's and the official SMSQ website) would have told the author that 'FEX' was already an existing keyword in one of our most used utilities (FileInfo2). My updated 'keywords list' have more than 3.500 entries now, but I don't yhink it is still worth while publishing. He is so right being picky about the way 'SMSQ is updated. François Van Emelen > > Best Wishes, > > Geoff _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
