On 22 January 2017 at 17:41, Wolf <w...@wlenerz.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Marcel Kilgus has fixed a bug in SMSQ/E. > > You could write: > > a$="1243" > PRINT a$(5 to) > > without any error, which was wrong. >
Is this really an error? You could simply return an empty string (as it does now). Recently I wrote an 'ls' procedure which does a lot of string slicing, I may have to add another boundary check now... (incidentally, PRINT a$(6 to) does give an error in the example above). regards, -- *Jan Bredenbeek* | Hilversum, NL | j...@bredenbeek.net _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
