> Having had to transfer a full QL system based on SGC/Qubide to .win with 150
> Mb, using DD would have been quite a nightmare.
Why should dd be a nightmare? Are you aware that dd means a utility
program, not floppies?
> I understand the effort to write such sw might not be negligible, but a
> utility which could manage to read native Qubide hard disks on a PC and
> transfer files to a .win file (and maybe vicecersa) I think would be very
If you have a PC with IDE port anyway, then where is the problem to use
dd to get the image?
QL-Users Mailing List