In message <3C9EC61F.3028.A3898@localhost>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes >Hi all, > >Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon, >Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it <BIG SNIP> >:
>Wolfgang Well laid out and expressed Wolfgang. One thing you did not mention was that a proportion of the sale price of the official version will still go to TT because we all thought that he deserved it not because he asked for it. I would like to say that, for myself and Q Branch, I think this is a very good development and one we should all embrace. I hope it will lead to further expansion of both the system and the user base. I would also hope that we can cease this fruitless competition between systems. All different systems which run a form of SMSQ/E have both advantages and disadvantages. I am very aware of this because I run three different ones here. Trying to shave a few milliseconds off a benchmark is a fairly pointless and boy-racer mentality. Extending SMSQ/E to use the colour drivers better, improve disk access, improve cache handling etc. is of more importance. I look forward to some innovative ideas and a brighter future. -- Roy Wood Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill Portslade. Sussex. BN41 2LB. UK Tel : +44 (0)1273 386030 Fax : +44 (0)1273 430501 (New number!) Mobile +44(0)7836 745501 Web : www.qbranch.demon.co.uk
