On 21 May 2002, at 7:19, Peter Graf wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > *** Distribution of executables for free was *not* forbidden in the first > > > official statement! This has changed and caused severe implications on the > > > availability of non-commercial work. *** > > > >I must take the blame for that - it was always INTENDED that the > >binaries were not to be distributed other than through the resellers. > > I don't blame you for tolerating distribution of SMSQ/E executables for > free in the first statement. This is what Tony Tebby would have allowed us! > The public ought to know it, even if it was published unintended.
Thanks, but the intention was, from the start, to limit distribution of the binaries. If that isn't clearly expressed, it was my fault. Wolfgang
