Qmail-SPP have a great community writing plugins, that are more compatible between them.
See, for example one of the battle-horses of this list, apply RBL _only_if_not_authenticated_ , is resolved in one of the plugins of Roberto Alsina's collection (http://ra-plugins.googlecode.com/) http://ra-plugins.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rblchecks.man.txt " If the user is successfully authenticated, this plugin disables itself for the session. This is necessary because most home IP addresses are listed in one RBL or the other. This behaviour, may become configurable in the future." This will help in, for example, using residential/dynamic IP blocklists without the worry of blocking your own users. This is just an example, I'm pretty sure a lot of functionality will be gained with Qmail-SPP, since not every one knows how to write a patch for qmail, but plugin's are much more easy (and can be as efficient as patches). Now, the problem is, who will have the time to work in this? :-) Just my two cents. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrador de Sistemas | http://www.e2000.es E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias | | E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios | Tel : +34 902 19 61 77 Mediadores de Seguros | | Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C | 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain | | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* -----Mensaje original----- De: Buzzz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de marzo de 2007 17:38 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP > I don't know for sure, but I doubt it. > > While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is > only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities > that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to > use that the toaster doesn't already provide? > > -- I have no particular feature would like to implement . I'm researching the optimal configuration to make a spam-gateway with qmail and I would like to use the toaster as it's base . I prefer the approach of spp cause is much more modular than write a patch everytime i need i new a feature and it appears to be not too far from the modularity of postfix . Mine would be only a curiosity regarding qmt's support for spp, nothing more . Thx for help :) Have Fun, Davide --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Sánchez Martín;David FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20060705T152542Z END:VCARD
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
