I was wondering about this... i've been hit by it as well. But only
when using firebug.
This fixes it for me. It seems more general though!

It also happens with errors that take place as the result of a timer
event. Perhaps all async type of request have this behavior with
firebug.

2008/2/14, Gaetan de Menten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Gaetan de Menten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > I've been having the following problem for quite a while: whenever I
> >  >  > throw an exception in a code which is executed in a callback of a
> >  >  > request, nothing noticeable happens, except the request just timeouts
> >  >  > (ie the initial exception is not printed in the (Firebug) console).
> >  >  >
> >  >  > var req = new qx.io.remote.Request("/");
> >  >  > req.setProhibitCaching(false);
> >  >  > req.addEventListener("completed", function(e) {
> >  >  >         throw new Error("test");
> >  >  > }, this);
> >  >  > req.send();
> >  >  >
> >  >  > I've just found a workaround, which is to enclose the callback code
> >  >  > into a try catch block and use this.error, as in:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > var req = new qx.io.remote.Request("/");
> >  >  > req.addEventListener("completed", function(e) {
> >  >  >     try {
> >  >  >         throw new Error("test");
> >  >  >     } catch (error) {
> >  >  >         this.error('Error in IO request', error);
> >  >  >     }
> >  >  > }, this);
> >  >  > req.send();
> >  >  >
> >  >  > This seems to work fine but produces longer than necessary tracebacks
> >  >  > and also require me to modify all my callbacks. I'd like a global fix
> >  >  > or workaround. This might not be a Qooxdoo bug (I suspect it's rather
> >  >  > a firebug bug or missing feature),  but nevertheless, has anybody
> >  >  > found a solution or another nicer workaround to this?
> >  >  >
> >  >  I suspect the problem are these lines of code in 
> > qx.io.remote.Exchange:900
> >  >
> >  >             try{
> >  >               this.dispatchEvent(vResponse);
> >  >             } catch(ex) {
> >  >               this.error("Dispatch failed", ex);
> >  >             }
> >  >
> >  >  The event dispatch is enclosed by a try catch block, which might "eat"
> >  >  your exception. What happens if you comment out the "try/catch"
> >  >  statement and call dispatchEvent without it?
> >  >
> >
> >  I don't have that try/catch block in my copy (0.7.x branch). Besides,
> >  I confirm this is a bug/missing feature in firebug and not in qooxdoo:
> >  with firebug disabled, I get the exception in firefox's "error
> >  console" as expected.
> >
> >  I guess I'll use my workaround (unless somebody has a better
> >  workaround to suggest) until the problem is fixed in firebug. Thanks
> >  all for your answers.
>
> For those who are interested, here is a patch to qooxdoo to workaround
> the problem globally.
>
> --
> Gaƫtan de Menten
> http://openhex.org
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to