Hi Jim,
you are absolutely right: there are many good reasons for using Qooxdoo, but
for me the main reason is the browser interoperability too. That's why I
prefer qooxdoo (as gui, inline or low level app) wherever possible and try
to avoid "naked" JS code.
Florian
P.S.: In the meantime I implemented what I wanted with the upload widget and
it works really fine.
2009/1/30 Jim Hunter <[email protected]>
> This is interesting. What it is doing is skirting the security issue by
> saying the only data you can send via their modified request object, is data
> that you have selected. So it looks like in FF3+ you can do a file upload
> without using a standard HTML form. But since no other browser supports it,
> I would not think it would be something that qooxdoo would try and
> incorporate (just my opinion). I can't speak for everyone, but I need to
> write apps that can be used by all current browsers. And I don't want to
> write special code just for FF and code for the rest of the browsers. For me
> the days of writing browser specific code are over. I use a technique
> similar to the file upload contribution and it works in all browsers.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Perhaps other browsers will see the light and
> do the very same thing.
>
> Jim
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
